ArticleScientific reports2026
Fractal dimension-based multi-focus image fusion via distance-weighted regional energy in curvelet domain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges of information loss and noise interference in multi-focus image fusion, this paper presents a novel curvelet-domain fusion algorithm based on distance-weighted regional energy (DWRE) and fractal dimension. The proposed method first decomposes the source images using the curvelet transform, obtaining both low- and high-frequency sub-bands. For the high-frequency sub-bands, fusion is performed using DWRE and fractal dimension in conjunction with a consistency verification strategy, ensuring that salient details and structural information are effectively preserved. For the low-frequency sub-band, an averaging-based fusion rule is applied to maintain overall intensity information. Finally, the inverse curvelet transform is employed to reconstruct the fused image. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, experiments are conducted on the Lytro and MFI-WHU benchmark datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach achieves superior fusion performance compared to several state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods, particularly in terms of detail preservation, noise suppression, and visual quality. Additionally, it demonstrates significant advantages in terms of the objective evaluation metrics [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.