ArticleScientific reports2026
Using wearable data to detect depression severity across clinical and non-clinical samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of depression is crucial, yet current assessment methods depend on self-report questionnaires and clinical interviews, which are resource-intensive. Wearable devices provide a scalable way to assess physiological and behavioral features, but their predictive value across clinical and non-clinical populations remains insufficiently established. Wearable-derived features were collected from a student sample (n = 187) and an outpatient sample (n = 95). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and participants were categorized as screen-positive for depressed (≥ 10) or non-depressed (< 10). An elastic net regularized logistic regression model was used for classification, with performance evaluated in held-out test data. Sensitivity analyses controlled for age and bedtime, tested alternative PHQ-9 cutoffs, and comparisons to baseline models with and without wearable features. Across the combined sample (n = 282), the model achieved good discriminative performance (area under the curve = 0.82; accuracy = 79%). Sensitivity analyses revealed that sample was a strong predictor, but wearable-derived features still added incremental value. Minimum awake heart rate, variability in sleep duration, and maximum step count emerged as the strongest predictors. Wearable-derived features show promise for detecting depressive symptoms across clinical and non-clinical populations. Sample-specific factors should be considered in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.