ArticleScientific reports2026
A diagnostic model based on pulmonary microbiota and host gene expression to distinguish colonization from pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumonia remains a leading cause of global mortality. Conventional diagnostic approaches frequently fail to distinguish microbial colonization from true infection in the lower respiratory tract, complicating clinical decision-making and contributing to antibiotic overuse. Improved diagnostic strategies are urgently needed. In this prospective, single-center study, deep sputum specimens were collected from patients with respiratory colonization (n = 17) and infectious pneumonia (n = 27) admitted to the neurosurgical ICU of Huashan Hospital. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and metatranscriptomic profiling were performed to characterize both the pulmonary microbiota and the host immune response. These features were subsequently integrated to construct a diagnostic model. Microbial community profiling revealed reduced alpha diversity and enrichment of metabolically active pathogenic taxa in the infection group, consistent with a dysbiotic state permissive to invasion. In contrast, the colonization group demonstrated a more balanced microbial ecosystem. Transcriptomic analyses identified 2232 differentially expressed host genes between the two groups. The colonization group showed marked activation of the Wnt, MAPK, chemokine, and focal adhesion pathways, which are functionally implicated in epithelial barrier maintenance and early immune homeostasis. A multi-omics diagnostic model incorporating seven gene features (ANKRD52, ZC3HAV1L, SERPINE3, CDPF1, ZNF720, TAGLN3, and LRRC15) achieved a discrimination between colonization and infection (AUC = 0.951 in the training cohort; 0.875 in the validation set). By jointly analyzing the pulmonary microbiome and host transcriptome, this study provides insight into host-microbe interactions distinguishing colonization from infection and presents a predictive model with potential clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.