ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence-powered evaluation model for English translation education in university: combining quantitative and qualitative methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing students' learning outcomes and abilities has always been a key link for English translation education in universities. However, traditional evaluation methods often face problems such as strong subjectivity and long time consumption, and it is difficult to meet the needs of large-scale classroom environments. To address these issues, this paper proposes and verifies a translation teaching quality evaluation model based on artificial intelligence (AI), aiming to improve the objectivity, consistency and efficiency of the evaluation. A mixed-methods design with data triangulation is employed to analyze data through a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. The quantitative part collects assessment feedback data from 796 English-related majors through questionnaire surveys, and the qualitative part uses focus group discussions to deeply analyze students' acceptance and trust in the AI evaluation system and the impact of AI evaluation on the development of translation ability. The results show that the AI evaluation model contributes to improving the consistency of evaluation results and the pertinence of feedback, and students have a high overall trust in AI evaluation. Nevertheless, some students questioned the limitations of AI in the cultural context and creativity evaluation. Based on the research findings, this paper further proposes practical suggestions for combining AI evaluation with traditional teacher evaluation in translation education, emphasizing the synergy between teachers and AI technology to achieve comprehensive optimization of translation teaching evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.