ArticleScientific reports2026
Loneliness and its associated factors among patients with cancer in China: a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loneliness is prevalent among patients with cancer in China and exerts adverse effects on both physical and mental health. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of loneliness and its associated factors, as well as to explore patients’ lived experiences, to inform clinical practice. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was adopted, incorporating a cross-sectional survey of 240 inpatients from oncology and general surgery departments of large-scale tertiary hospitals, along with descriptive phenomenological interviews conducted with 18 patients scoring ≥ 20 on the loneliness scale. Quantitative results revealed an average loneliness score of 19.13 ± 6.26, with 83.8% of patients experiencing moderate to severe loneliness. Multiple regression analysis identified introversion, absence of caregivers, disease duration > 3 years, low social support, depression, negative social expectations, and passive coping as significant predictors (P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis identified three main themes—experiences of loneliness, influencing factors (internal and external), and coping strategies—comprising seven subthemes. The findings underscore the importance of identifying high-risk patients and implementing targeted interventions, encouraging emotional expression, and providing supportive channels to mitigate loneliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.