ArticleScientific reports2026
Identifying Long Covid phenotypes and their association with personal characteristics, healthcare use, and daily life burden: population-based study in Belgium.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long Covid (LC), a multisystem disorder with persistent symptoms > 4 weeks post COVID-19, has impacted healthcare systems substantially. As information is scarce for Belgium, this study aimed to identify LC phenotypes and assess participant characteristics, healthcare use and daily life burden by phenotype. The last survey wave of COVimpact (a longitudinal online cohort study among Belgian adults recruited after SARS-CoV-2 infection) focused on LC with questions on healthcare utilization and perceived daily impact. A latent class analysis (LCA) identified phenotypes, based on symptom type, disease duration, and LC-related disability. Backward multivariable multinomial logistic regression explored predictors of LC class membership. Among 1,840 respondents self-reporting LC, four phenotypes emerged. Class 1 presented mild clinical outcomes, class 2 and 3 presented moderate clinical outcomes, differentiated by symptoms of memory problems and brain fog (class 2), and respiratory problems and muscle/joint pain (class 3), and class 4 included the most severe clinical outcomes. Compared to class 1, being older, female, lower educated, non-European, obese and experiencing moderate to severe acute COVID-19 symptoms predicted higher class severity. Diagnosis, healthcare use and support differed among adults with moderate and severe LC, many reported insufficient healthcare access and major disruption to daily life, including absenteeism from work/school. People with severe LC were the most financially impacted. By distinguishing LC phenotypes, this study enhances understanding of varying healthcare trajectories and daily life impacts. Healthcare planning and support should be more effectively tailored to the specific needs of those affected by LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.