Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933049›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The East Asian climate-warfare nexus underwent a paradigm shift across pre-industrial and industrial eras.

Huan Chang, Miao Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huan ChangState Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Miao FangState Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China. mfang@lzb.ac.cn.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFF0801102National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) project 42171044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

East Asia, marked by exceptional climatic diversity, high population density and rapid development, faces severe transboundary climate-security risks under anthropogenic climate extremes. Understanding the climate-warfare nexus-especially by comparing causal pathways under natural versus anthropogenic forcing-is critical for conflict prevention, yet quantitative comparisons across these regimes remain lacking. This study examines the climate-warfare relationship in East Asia from 1400 to 1980 CE using correlation, regression and causal analysis of climate, population, land use and warfare data. Results uncover a paradigm shift: from a slow, feedback-driven Malthusian system in the pre-industrial era to a rapid, socioeconomically-mediated resilient system in the industrial period. Crucially, temperature's causal role shifted from a linear driver of warfare to a non-linear "threat multiplier", indicating that climate-warfare pathways are not static but transform over time. This evolution-from a vulnerable system trapped in crisis feedback loops to a resilient one capable of absorbing shocks-implies that under modern anthropogenic warming, climate anomalies may interact with social systems in non-linear and potentially abrupt ways, necessitating advanced strategies to mitigate future climate-driven conflict risks. By integrating causal analysis, this work addresses key research gaps and offers new insights into the evolving nature of climate-warfare nexus.

Indexed as

Casual analysisClimate-warfare nexusComparative analysisPre-industrial and industrial erasQuantitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID41933049
PMCPMC13194969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.