Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933045›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2026

Verification and execution of the scientific literature via chemputation augmented by large language models.

Sebastian Pagel, Michael Jirasek, Leroy Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Chemputer and chemputation-A universal chemical compound synthesis machine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sebastian PagelSchool of Chemistry, The University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6327-9803
Michael JirasekSchool of Chemistry, The University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-6457
Leroy CroninSchool of Chemistry, The University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, UK. Lee.Cronin@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-5757

Funding

RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/L023652/1, EP/R01308X/1, EP/S019472/1 and EP/P00153X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemputation is the process of programming chemical robots to do experiments using a universal symbolic language, but literature can be error-prone and hard to read due to ambiguities. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various domains, including natural language processing, robotic control, and more recently, chemistry. Despite significant advancements in standardizing synthetic chemistry data, automatic reproduction and verification of reported syntheses remains labor-intensive task. We introduce an LLM-based chemical research agent workflow for automatic verification of synthetic literature procedures. Our workflow can autonomously extract synthetic procedures and analytical data from extensive documents, translate these procedures into universal XDL code, simulate the execution in a hardware-specific setup, and ultimately execute the procedure on an XDL-controlled robotic system for synthetic chemistry to confirm the procedure works in the real world. This demonstrates the potential of LLM-based workflows for autonomous chemical synthesis with Chemputers. While recent LLM-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in autonomous experiment planning, a robust workflow for the faithful digitization and verification of existing literature remains a challenge. Our approach bridges this gap by providing six realistic examples of syntheses directly executed from synthetic literature on two robotic platforms. Our workflow will significantly enhance automation in robotically driven synthetic chemistry research, streamline data extraction, improve the reproducibility, scalability, and safety of synthetic chemistry.

Identifiers

PMID41933045
PMCPMC13219472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.