ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Verification and execution of the scientific literature via chemputation augmented by large language models.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- On-DNA photochemical methods for expanding DNA-encoded library (DEL) chemical space.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Chemputer and chemputation-A universal chemical compound synthesis machine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- General-Purpose Models for the Chemical Sciences: LLMs and Beyond.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemputation is the process of programming chemical robots to do experiments using a universal symbolic language, but literature can be error-prone and hard to read due to ambiguities. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various domains, including natural language processing, robotic control, and more recently, chemistry. Despite significant advancements in standardizing synthetic chemistry data, automatic reproduction and verification of reported syntheses remains labor-intensive task. We introduce an LLM-based chemical research agent workflow for automatic verification of synthetic literature procedures. Our workflow can autonomously extract synthetic procedures and analytical data from extensive documents, translate these procedures into universal XDL code, simulate the execution in a hardware-specific setup, and ultimately execute the procedure on an XDL-controlled robotic system for synthetic chemistry to confirm the procedure works in the real world. This demonstrates the potential of LLM-based workflows for autonomous chemical synthesis with Chemputers. While recent LLM-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in autonomous experiment planning, a robust workflow for the faithful digitization and verification of existing literature remains a challenge. Our approach bridges this gap by providing six realistic examples of syntheses directly executed from synthetic literature on two robotic platforms. Our workflow will significantly enhance automation in robotically driven synthetic chemistry research, streamline data extraction, improve the reproducibility, scalability, and safety of synthetic chemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.