ArticleScientific reports2026
MRI-based brain tumor prediction using convolutional neural network framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multilevel Deep Learning Model for Automated Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Magnetic Resonance Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantum-inspired optimization of transformer-capsule networks for accurate brain tumor segmentation and classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning technology enables the transformation of healthcare, focusing on the deployment of lightweight or hybrid diagnostic models for insufficiently resourced medical facilities. Early-stage brain tumor diagnosis supports doctors in developing better treatment strategies and enhancing prognosis results. In this work, we present a CNN-based model for automated brain tumor identification through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our model achieved better generalization capability through pre-processed imaging that involved normalization followed by segmentation. Optimization was carried out using hyperparameter tuning, early stopping and model checkpointing. The model exhibited remarkable performance, attaining 99% accuracy, sensitivity and specificity and precision. Reliability and robustness measurements were validated through comprehensive evaluation metrics, including confusion matrix analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and F1-score. The findings indicate the effectiveness of the proposed CNN framework as an effective and computationally feasible decision-support system in aid of radiologists in the early detection of brain tumors, especially in the context of limited resources healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.