Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dual knowledge-guided data augmentation for robust clinical prediction models.

Sangwoo Moon, Peong Gang Park, Naye Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Seon Hee Lim, Joo Hoon Lee, Min Ji Park, Hee Sun Baek, Min Hyun Cho, Keum Hwa Lee and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sangwoo MoonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Peong Gang ParkDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Severance Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Naye ChoiDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Hyun KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Seon Hee LimDepartment of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Joo Hoon LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Ji ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Hee Sun BaekDepartment of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Min Hyun ChoDepartment of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Keum Hwa LeeDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Severance Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jae Il ShinDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Severance Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyoung Hee HanDepartment of Pediatrics, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, South Korea.
Jeong Yeon KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ji Yeon SongDepartment of Pediatrics, Pusan National University Children's Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Eun Mi YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University School of Medicine, Gwangju, South Korea.
Seong Heon KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Yo Han AhnDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hee Gyung KangDepartment of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Eujin ParkDepartment of Pediatrics, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. eujinpark@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea National Institute of Health No. 2025E110100Korea University Medicine No. K2427191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domain shift poses a critical barrier to adopting medical artificial intelligence (AI) models, a challenge that is particularly acute in data-scarce, single-source domain generalization (SSDG) settings. Conventional data-augmentation techniques, including Mixup and input masking, fail to leverage the rich structural information and expert knowledge inherent in clinical data, causing models to overfit by learning spurious correlations. To address this, we propose a dual knowledge-guided data augmentation framework that enhances model robustness by systematically embedding clinical expertise into the training process. It comprises two novel components: similarity-guided Mixup, which generates clinically plausible virtual samples by interpolating between patients with similar clinical profiles, and group-based masking, which simulates realistic missing-data patterns by concurrently masking clinically correlated features. We validated our framework on the multicenter KNOW-pedCKD cohort for pediatric chronic kidney disease, training it exclusively on a single-source domain and evaluating it on three unseen target domains. It demonstrated significant performance gains in recall, a metric of critical importance in clinical settings. This study demonstrates that embedding domain knowledge into data augmentation is a promising strategy for developing generalizable and trustworthy medical AI models capable of operating reliably across heterogeneous clinical environments. The codes are available at https://github.com/msw6468/dual_augmentation_public .

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAlgorithmsHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsChronic kidney diseaseClinical knowledgeData augmentationDomain generalizationDomain shiftMaskingMixup

Identifiers

PMID41933018
PMCPMC13199374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.