ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of dyslipidemia on fertility-sparing treatment outcomes in endometrial atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a large cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of dyslipidemia on outcomes of fertility-preserving treatment in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). A total of 406 patients, including 118 EEC and 288 EAH, who received fertility-sparing treatment between January 2017 and December 2020 were included and divided into a dyslipidemia group (n = 282) and a non-dyslipidemia group (n = 124). The 16-/32-week complete response (CR) rate, pregnancy outcome, and recurrence were compared between patients with and without dyslipidemia. Furthermore, we explored the effect of different indicators of dyslipidemia, including total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), on the therapeutic effects of fertility-preserving treatment. A total of 282 (69.5%) patients were diagnosed with dyslipidemia, and 38 patients were diagnosed with mixed dyslipidemia. The 16-/32-week CR rate, pregnant rate, live birth rate, and recurrence did not have significant differences between patients with and without dyslipidemia. Patients with mixed dyslipidemia had a lower 32-week CR rate (42.1% vs.65.5%, P = 0.004) and a longer treatment duration to achieve CR (33.4 weeks vs. 27.0 weeks, P = 0.039, HR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53–0.98) than those without mixed dyslipidemia. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that mixed dyslipidemia was significantly associated with a lower 32-week CR rate (OR: 0.322, 95% CI: 0.134–0.775, P = 0.011). Patients with both overweight and mixed dyslipidemia had the lowest 32-week CR rate (12/31, 38.5%, P = 0.007) and longest median treatment duration to CR (34.0 weeks, 95%CI: 25.7–42.3 weeks, P = 0.025). Mixed dyslipidemia was an independent risk factor for fertility-preserving treatment outcomes in EAH or EEC patients, as this group had a lower 32-week CR rate and a longer treatment duration to achieve CR than those without mixed dyslipidemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.