Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41933002›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

UV-C LED wavelength effects on inactivation kinetics, DNA damage and membrane integrity in drinking water indicator bacteria.

João Sério, Carolina Santos, Maria Eduarda Martins, Ana Paula Marques, Carolina Feliciano, Mónica Serrano, Adriano O Henriques, Maria Teresa Barreto Crespo, Vanessa Jorge Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

João SérioiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Carolina SantosiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Maria Eduarda MartinsiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Ana Paula MarquesiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Carolina FelicianoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República, Oeiras, 2780-157, Portugal.
Mónica SerranoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República, Oeiras, 2780-157, Portugal.
Adriano O HenriquesInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Av. da República, Oeiras, 2780-157, Portugal.
Maria Teresa Barreto CrespoiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal.
Vanessa Jorge PereiraiBET - Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal. vanessap@ibet.pt.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2022.12621.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia CEECIND/02919/2018Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/EAM-AMB/1561/2021, UIDB/04551/2020, UID/04462PPBI - Portuguese Platform of BioImaging PPBI-POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have emerged as a promising technology for water disinfection, offering selectable wavelengths that enable more precise targeting of specific cellular components. This study evaluated the inactivation efficiency of water quality indicators with different cell morphologies and envelope organization, Escherichia coli (Gram-negative) and Enterococcus faecium (Gram-positive), including both environmental and culture collection strains, using UV-C LEDs that emit light at 255 nm, 260 nm, 265 nm, 270 nm, and 280 nm. Inactivation kinetics as well as post-exposure repair, under dark and light conditions, were evaluated. Fluorescence microscopy observations and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation were analyzed to elucidate morphological changes and DNA damage. Within the tested range, 265 nm LEDs achieved the highest inactivation rates for E. coli at a given UV fluence, consistent with the DNA absorption maximum in the 260-270 nm region. In contrast, E. faecium showed similar inactivation between 260 and 270 nm. Nevertheless, all tested wavelengths demonstrated high efficacy, achieving up to 6-log inactivation of both culture collection and environmental strains at low UV fluences (below 7 mJ/cm²). E. faecium showed enhanced resilience at lower fluences for all the wavelengths tested. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that both membrane integrity and DNA structure were increasingly affected by higher UV fluences, although signs of DNA damage were more pronounced and detectable even at lower exposure levels. Additionally, none of the strains tested showed considerable photoreactivation or dark repair capability, implying that the induced DNA lesions were largely irreversible under our experimental conditions. This study shows the efficacy of UV-C LEDs for water disinfection across a range of wavelengths, particularly at 265 nm, highlighting the important contribution of DNA damage to bacterial inactivation, and emphasizing their applicability for the water industry.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneDisinfectionDNA DamageDrinking WaterEnterococcus faeciumEscherichia coliUltraviolet RaysWater PurificationKineticsMicrobial ViabilityDrinking WaterDisinfectionUltraviolet light emitting diodesWater quality indicatorsWater treatmentWavelengths

Identifiers

PMID41933002
PMCPMC13195164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.