ArticleScientific reports2026
UV-C LED wavelength effects on inactivation kinetics, DNA damage and membrane integrity in drinking water indicator bacteria.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have emerged as a promising technology for water disinfection, offering selectable wavelengths that enable more precise targeting of specific cellular components. This study evaluated the inactivation efficiency of water quality indicators with different cell morphologies and envelope organization, Escherichia coli (Gram-negative) and Enterococcus faecium (Gram-positive), including both environmental and culture collection strains, using UV-C LEDs that emit light at 255 nm, 260 nm, 265 nm, 270 nm, and 280 nm. Inactivation kinetics as well as post-exposure repair, under dark and light conditions, were evaluated. Fluorescence microscopy observations and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation were analyzed to elucidate morphological changes and DNA damage. Within the tested range, 265 nm LEDs achieved the highest inactivation rates for E. coli at a given UV fluence, consistent with the DNA absorption maximum in the 260-270 nm region. In contrast, E. faecium showed similar inactivation between 260 and 270 nm. Nevertheless, all tested wavelengths demonstrated high efficacy, achieving up to 6-log inactivation of both culture collection and environmental strains at low UV fluences (below 7 mJ/cm²). E. faecium showed enhanced resilience at lower fluences for all the wavelengths tested. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that both membrane integrity and DNA structure were increasingly affected by higher UV fluences, although signs of DNA damage were more pronounced and detectable even at lower exposure levels. Additionally, none of the strains tested showed considerable photoreactivation or dark repair capability, implying that the induced DNA lesions were largely irreversible under our experimental conditions. This study shows the efficacy of UV-C LEDs for water disinfection across a range of wavelengths, particularly at 265 nm, highlighting the important contribution of DNA damage to bacterial inactivation, and emphasizing their applicability for the water industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.