Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41932995›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Automatic speech analysis can predict loneliness.

Diana Immel, Elisa Mallick, Nicklas Linz, Simon Barton, René Hurlemann, Dirk Scheele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana ImmelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. diana.immel@uni-oldenburg.de.
Elisa Mallickki:elements GmbH, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nicklas Linzki:elements GmbH, 66111, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Simon BartonDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
René HurlemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Dirk ScheeleResearch Center One Health Ruhr of the University Alliance Ruhr, Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, 44780, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness has been demonstrated to exert a detrimental effect on mental and physical health. It may impede the formation of new social relationships by altering interactional behavior. This study provides a proof-of-concept that loneliness is reflected in altered speech, demonstrating that small yet significant effects can make loneliness audible. Samples of 96 healthy participants (mean age 31.08 years, 53 women) were recorded while they performed a picture description and storytelling task. Paralinguistic markers related to prosodic, formant, source, and temporal qualities of speech were extracted and correlated with loneliness, social anxiety and depression. To validate the diagnostic power, machine learning analyses were conducted for women and men separately. A model comprising all speech features from the picture description task significantly predicted loneliness. However, this model did not predict loneliness from the storytelling task. No single speech feature emerged as a strong predictor of loneliness. A combined model that included both speech features and psychiatric symptoms provided better predictions than psychiatric symptoms alone only in women. Overall, these findings suggest that speech offers a new perspective on how loneliness becomes perceptible to others and how it may disrupt social interactions, thereby fostering chronicity.

Indexed as

LonelinessSpeechAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDepressionLonelinessSocial anxietySpeech analysisSpeech marker

Identifiers

PMID41932995
PMCPMC13056942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.