ArticleScientific reports2026
Time aware cyclic queuing forwarding traffic scheduling algorithm considering reallocation and priority sorting (RPS-TACQF).
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To meet the mixed traffic scheduling requirements of time-triggered (TT) streams and audio video bridging (AVB) streams in the industrial Internet, this paper proposes a time aware cyclic queuing forwarding traffic scheduling algorithm considering reallocation and priority sorting (RPS-TACQF) method. Combining time aware shaper (TAS) and cyclic queuing and forwarding (CQF) mechanisms, it dynamically adjusts the queue resource allocation and traffic forwarding order, and uses the dead time of CQF odd and even queue switching to schedule TAS, optimize the frame injection time slot and routing, while meeting their respective end-to-end delay and jitter requirements. The experimental results show that the RPS-TACQF algorithm significantly improves the scheduling success rate in scenarios with 50 TT data streams and 100-1000 AVB data streams, especially under high load conditions, where the scheduling success rate of AVB data streams is about 36.5% higher than other algorithms; The bandwidth utilization rate increased by about 36.5% under high load, and the algorithm execution time still saved about 31.4% compared to the TAMCQF-ILP solver algorithm under high load networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.