ArticleScientific reports2026
Developing a custom loss function for regulating underestimation and overestimation of concrete mechanical properties predictions in neural network models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of concrete properties is a critical aspect of structural engineering. Conventional neural network models, while effective in various predictive tasks, often fall short in this context because they do not distinguish between the risks associated with underestimation and overestimation of strength. Existing codes of practice in civil engineering advocate a conservative estimation approach, prioritizing underestimation to preserve safety margins. Standard neural network models, which treat all prediction errors uniformly, are therefore not aligned with this conservative bias, which motivates the present study. The aim of this research is to design a custom loss function that embeds domain-specific safety requirements into artificial intelligence models. This function penalizes underestimations less severely than overestimations, reflecting the conservative principles of structural design. The problem formulation emphasizes the importance of conservative concrete strength prediction within the broader context of structural safety. Rubberized concrete is adopted as a case study to investigate the performance of the proposed custom loss function and to benchmark it against traditional loss functions. The study results show that the developed custom loss function effectively addresses conservative estimation needs by reducing the overestimation ratio from about 25–100% with traditional approaches to as low as 1%. At the same time, prediction accuracy remains comparable to conventional loss functions. Accordingly, the proposed custom loss function can serve as a technical enhancement that improves prediction behavior in line with conservative design philosophy and supports the reliable use of neural network models as one component within the structural design process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.