Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41932961›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The emergence of trust under conditions of distrust.

Anna Lena Fehlhaber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anna Lena FehlhaberLeibniz university Hannover, Hanover, Germany. fehlhaberlena@googlemail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genesis of trust between strangers on the Internet - without the protective and structuring framework of digital platforms - is a topic that has been little researched so far. This need for research is exploratively approached via an experimental social deduction game, which is intended to make online trust decisions visible under distrustful conditions. A total of 101 participants took part in the nine rounds of the game, whose numerous game and trust decisions were evaluated under distrust-promoting conditions of the game setting. By using this complex experimental setting, various factors influencing trust could be included and it could be shown that trust in the digital space can arise even under persistent distrust and can be observed in the context of a social deduction game.

Indexed as

Quantitative social researchSimulationTrust in strangers

Identifiers

PMID41932961
PMCPMC13049019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.