ArticleNPJ science of learning2026
Neurocognitive academic training to improve symptoms executive functions and Chinese handwriting in children with ADHD.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the efficacy of Neurocognitive-Academic Training (NAT) which is an integrating computerized neurocognitive training, teacher positive feedback, and handwriting practice for children with ADHD. Fifty-six children (5-9 years) were assigned to NAT or a control group. Significant Time × Group interactions revealed that NAT yielded large-effect improvements in inhibitory control, on-task behavior, handwriting construction and accuracy, and parent/homeroom teacher-rated inattention and hyperactivity. While working memory also showed significant improvement in the NAT group, its progression differed, reflected in significant main effects rather than an interaction. No effects emerged for handwriting directionality. Domain-specific efficacy gradients were observed, with maximal benefits for handwriting construction (η²p = 0.68) and accuracy (η²p = 0.45), and parent-rated inattention (η²p = 0.46). The findings demonstrate that a low-frequency NAT protocol can simultaneously enhance behavioral, cognitive, and academic outcomes, highlighting the value of embedding neurocognitive training within ecologically valid academic contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.