Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41932896›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

A conversational multi-agent AI system for automated plant phenotyping.

Feng Chen, Ilias Stogiannidis, Andrew Wood, Danilo Bueno, Dominic Williams, Fraser Macfarlane, Bruce D Grieve, Darren Wells, Jonathan A Atkinson, Malcolm J Hawkesford and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Feng ChenInstitute for Imaging, Data and Communications (IDCOM), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Feng.Chen@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2915-599X
Ilias StogiannidisInstitute for Imaging, Data and Communications (IDCOM), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5803-1138
Andrew WoodInstitute for Imaging, Data and Communications (IDCOM), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-0774
Danilo BuenoInstitute for Imaging, Data and Communications (IDCOM), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3036-7010
Dominic WilliamsJames Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8908-6696
Fraser MacfarlaneJames Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-1446
Bruce D GrieveDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-3592
Darren WellsSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4246-4909
Jonathan A AtkinsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-0812
Malcolm J HawkesfordRothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8759-3969
Stephen A RolfeSchool of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2141-4707
Tracy LawsonDepartment of Plant Biology and Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4073-7221
Tony PridmoreSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sotirios A TsaftarisInstitute for Imaging, Data and Communications (IDCOM), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. S.Tsaftaris@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8795-9294
Mario Valerio GiuffridaSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Valerio.Giuffrida@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-677X

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/X011003/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/Y512333/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/X033686/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/Y028856/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant phenotyping increasingly relies on (semi-)automated image-based analysis workflows to improve its accuracy and scalability. However, many existing solutions remain overly complex, difficult to reimplement and maintain, and pose high barriers for users without substantial computational expertise. To address these challenges, we introduce PhenoAssistant: a pioneering AI-driven system that streamlines plant phenotyping via intuitive natural language interaction. PhenoAssistant leverages a large language model to orchestrate a curated toolkit supporting tasks including automated phenotype extraction, data visualisation and automated model training. We validate PhenoAssistant through several representative case studies and a set of evaluation tasks. By lowering technical hurdles, PhenoAssistant underscores the promise of AI-driven methodologies to democratising AI adoption in plant biology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePlantsAutomationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLarge Language ModelsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID41932896
PMCPMC13376813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.