ArticleHead & neck2026
Significance of Preoperative Imaging-Detected Extranodal Extension in Pathological Extranodal Extension-Positive Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Head & neck, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) recently proposed standardized classifications for imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) and pathological ENE (pENE). We evaluated the prognostic value of iENE in pENE-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
methodsPatients with pENE-positive HNSCC who underwent postoperative CRT were retrospectively analyzed. iENE and pENE were re-classified using HNCIG criteria. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsNinety-two patients were included. iENE grades 2-3 were associated with significantly worse outcomes than grades 0-1 (3-year RFS: 68.5% vs. 31.5%, log-rank p = 0.0002; 3-year OS: 85.0% vs. 63.2%, log-rank p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, iENE was the only independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS.
conclusionPreoperative iENE is a prognostic factor in pENE-positive HNSCC after postoperative CRT, with grades 2-3 identifying a very high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.