ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
The Burden of Adverse Drug Reactions in Africa in the Context of Pharmacogenetics-Based Clinical Guidelines.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic variation has a significant impact on patients' response to medicines. Variations in important pharmacogenes have been evaluated in several studies and consequently led to international guidelines from clinical pharmacogenomics consortia. However, there are limited examples of these being implemented across the African continent despite the increased evidence of how these variants contribute to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or ineffective treatments. Considering the vast genetic diversity in Africa, there are significant gaps in understanding how much of a negative effect this might be having across healthcare across the continent. We therefore sought to establish the extent of ADRs from a subset of medicines shown to be associated with pharmacogenetic biomarkers from the last 10 years across 47 countries on the African continent. In the absence of pharmacogenetic testing on the African continent, we used international guidelines to derive a subset of definitions associated with published drug-gene-interaction associated ADRs to infer the role of pharmacogenetic variation on the prevalence of ADRs. The data showed that African countries report only 1% of ADRs in the VigiBase database, indicative of weak pharmacovigilance programs on the continent. Our analysis revealed that ADRs were mainly caused by anti-infectives such as efavirenz. The inferred pharmacogenes associated with high prevalence of ADRs were CYP2B6, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19. Using limited data, this foundational analysis may serve as the basis for stakeholders to prioritize pharmacogenetic interventions across the African continent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.