ArticleBMJ open quality2026
Overview of Perinatal Quality Collaboratives and their activities to advance perinatal healthcare in the USA, 2022-2023.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving quality and safety at scale.Pediatric research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPerinatal Quality Collaboratives (PQCs) are state multidisciplinary teams working to improve maternal and infant healthcare by implementing quality improvement (QI) initiatives and other activities (initiatives/activities). This study aimed to improve understanding of the scope of PQCs and their work across the USA from 2022 to 2023.
methodsThe National Network of PQCs conducted an online assessment of PQCs representing all 50 US states and the District of Columbia during May-July 2023. While the assessment included some historical questions, most questions asked PQCs to report on work conducted from 1 April 2022 to 31 March 2023. Descriptive statistics of assessment data-including PQC characteristics, participation, community partner engagement, QI initiatives, and activities-were calculated.
resultsThe 45 responding PQCs were primarily housed in departments of health (35.6%), academic institutions (33.3%), or non-profit organisations (22.2%). Sixty-two percent of PQCs were established within the past 10 years (2014-2023). On average, 72.6% of birthing hospitals in each state participated in their PQC. Among the 26 PQCs with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) participation, an average of 77.1% of NICUs in the state participated in their PQC. Thirty-two PQCs (71.1%) engaged with ≥1 patient/family member, and 30 PQCs (66.7%) engaged with ≥1 community-based organisation. PQCs reported on 195 initiatives/activities that they worked on during the reporting period. Twenty-six PQCs (57.8%) were working on 3-5 initiatives/activities. Most initiatives/activities were maternal-focused (n=105, 54.4%), followed by mother-infant-dyad-focused (n=53, 27.5%), and neonatal-focused (n=30, 15.5%). The most frequent initiative/activity topics were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; substance use disorders among pregnant women; respectful care and non-medical factors that impact health; neonatal abstinence syndrome; and mental health among pregnant/postpartum women.
conclusionThese findings illustrate the breadth of PQC work and how PQCs could contribute to national efforts to improve perinatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.