ArticleBMJ open2026
Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOverweight and obesity are a growing global public health problem. Eating behaviours of adults and children are largely influenced by the home food environment (HFE). The lack of access to nutritious food in homes contributes to unhealthy dietary habits and, consequently, overweight and obesity among adults and children, as well as chronic diseases associated with poor diets. The present systematic review aims to identify existing HFE and household food security interventions and to determine the effects of these interventions in improving the availability of healthy food in the home, household access to food, diet quality and nutritional status of adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be searched for relevant articles using keywords and MeSH terms. Risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group and Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The overall strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified records and assess the eligible full texts for inclusion. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. A thematic synthesis will be performed for qualitative studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has a systematic review and meta-analysis design, which will assess published data and does not require ethical approval. Findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251030896.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.