ArticleBiological psychiatry2026
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Psychiatry: A Pharmacoepidemiological Scoping Review.
Article in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Central nervous system effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: A systematic review of human neuroimaging studies.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Decoding the Safety Profile of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Facts, Myths, and Ongoing Controversies.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- GLP-1-targeted therapies for alcohol and other substance use disorders: a new era on the horizon?The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pharmacoepidemiological studies have expanded the capacity to detect therapeutic benefits and adverse drug effects of medications. In the case of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), their fast uptake for treating diabetes and obesity has generated substantial real-world experience, facilitating exploration of benefits for additional indications. In the context of psychiatric disorders, studies based on pharmacovigilance data and large electronic health record (EHR) databases have shown that initial concerns regarding an association between suicidality and GLP-1RA use were not supported by the evidence. Emerging data also suggest potential therapeutic benefits, with the strongest evidence for substance use disorders, binge-eating disorder, and bulimia nervosa, as well as improved metabolic outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether such beneficial associations represent mechanistic effects, and further surveillance is needed to assess potential risks for anorexia. Also, more comprehensive EHR databases using harmonized methodologies and integrated with multimodal data will expand pharmacoepidemiology capabilities, including the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this scoping review, we summarize the pharmacoepidemiologic evidence regarding the potential psychiatric effects, both therapeutic and adverse, of GLP-1RAs and the methodological and translational gaps that need to be addressed to strengthen the robustness of pharmacoepidemiologic findings and accelerate therapeutic discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.