Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41931529›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Resilience of anaerobic digestion to polypropylene microplastic contamination: Kinetic and structural evidence.

Napapat Sitthikitpanya, Alissara Reungsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Napapat SitthikitpanyaDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Alissara ReungsangDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-032X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of microplastics (MPs) in organic waste streams raises concerns about their impact on anaerobic digestion (AD). This study examined the effect of polypropylene MPs (PP-MPs) on methane production during AD of food waste for 150 days under batch conditions. PP-MPs were added at 10-300 mg g-1 total solids (TS), covering reported MP levels in food waste and food packaging materials and extending to worst-case scenarios. Methane yields ranged from 310.2 to 324.4 mL CH4 g-1 volatile solids (VS) across treatments versus 334.3 ± 5.2 mL CH4 g-1 VS in the control, with no significant differences (p = 0.634). Kinetic modeling confirmed no consistent inhibitory trends. FTIR and SEM analyses indicated minor surface oxidation and cracking on PP-MPs, while the polymer backbone remained intact, suggesting only superficial aging. These results provide critical assurance for waste-to-energy facilities processing plastic-contaminated organic waste streams. Although PP-MPs do not impair AD performance, their persistence and potential fragmentation pose environmental risks. These findings provide critical insight into the resilience of AD systems and emphasize the need for strategies to mitigate secondary MP formation in biogas production from contaminated waste streams.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsPolypropylenesAnaerobiosisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalFood Loss and WasteKineticsMethaneFood Loss and WasteMethaneMicroplasticsPolypropylenes

Identifiers

PMID41931529
PMCPMC13048406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.