ArticlePloS one2026
Association of the 24-hour movement behaviours composition with workers' chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic musculoskeletal pain is a significant symptom among workers. 24-hour movement behaviours comprising sleep, sedentary behaviour, light-intensity physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity are associated factors. However, the relationships between these behaviours and workers' chronic musculoskeletal pain, considering the interrelationship between the behaviours, are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations of 24-hour movement behaviours with workers' low-back and neck/shoulder pain.
methodsIn 2023, cross-sectional survey was conducted targeting adults who registered for a Japanese Internet survey system. Time for 24-hour movement behaviours and other demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, education, household income, height, weight, smoking, alcohol, chronic disease, work hours, and job activity) were self-reported. The intensity of low-back and neck/shoulder pain was evaluated using the numerical rating scale and a score of ≥4 was considered as moderate-to-severe pain. Compositional logistic regression and isotemporal substitution were performed to examine the associations of 24-hour movement behaviours and time reallocations between the behaviours with moderate-to-severe low-back and neck/shoulder pain, adjusted for all the demographic variables.
results1,665 full-time workers (women: 35.8%, mean age: 42.1 ± 10.2 years) were analysed. Increased sleep and decreased light-intensity or moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity were associated with lower odds of moderate-to-severe low-back (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.40-0.72; 1.45, 1.25-1.69; 1.17, 1.06-1.30, respectively) and neck/shoulder pain (AOR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45-0.80; 1.37, 1.19-1.60; 1.12, 1.01-1.24, respectively). Reallocating sleep from the other behaviours was associated with decreased probabilities of low-back and neck/shoulder pain, whereas replacing sedentary behaviour or light-intensity physical activity with more intense activity was associated with increased probabilities. However, the results of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity reallocation were no longer significant when restricted to complete cases.
conclusionsConsidering the interrelationship of 24-hour movement behaviours, sleep was favourably associated with workers' low-back and neck/shoulder pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.