Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41931482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Facilitators and barriers to compliance with a raw coal ban amongst pregnant women and mothers of young children in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: A mixed-methods study.

Rob Miller, Emma Dickinson-Craig, Sophie Harbach, Charles Vickers, Enkhdulguun Amgalan, Mark Baker, MNUMS APF Group, Ninjbadgar Zorigtbaatar, Terkhen Turbat, Mandukhai Ganbat and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rob MillerInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Emma Dickinson-CraigInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1111-8680
Sophie HarbachInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Charles VickersInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Enkhdulguun AmgalanMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Mark BakerInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
MNUMS APF Group
Ninjbadgar ZorigtbaatarMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Terkhen TurbatMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Mandukhai GanbatDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Chimedsuren OchirMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
David WarburtonThe Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
G Neil ThomasInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jargalsaikhan BadarchMongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-6455
Rosie DaySchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, is in the midst of a winter air pollution crisis driven by the combustion of solid fuels in the peri-urban Ger districts to which young children, fetuses and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable. To address this, the Mongolian government banned the sale and use of raw coal in May 2019 and has subsidized and promoted refined coal briquettes as an alternative fuel. This mixed-methods study utilized semi-structured interviews (n = 30) and a questionnaire survey (n = 369) to identify facilitators and barriers to compliance with the ban amongst Mongolian mothers living in Ulaanbaatar. Four main themes were identified that affected compliance: knowledge about air pollution, information sources, initial policy impacts and governance. Facilitators of participants' ban compliance included awareness of the severity of air pollution's health impacts, support for the policy and governmental enforcement. Concerns regarding fuel alternative safety and affordability, as well as uncertainty about the policy itself (inadequate information) were found to be barriers. Incorporation of these insights in future air pollution mitigation strategies could be beneficial for strengthening their effectiveness, both in Mongolia and settings that face similar challenges throughout the world, which in turn could be a crucial step in meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda.

Indexed as

Air PollutionCoalMothersPregnant PeopleAdultFemaleHumansMongoliaPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCoal

Identifiers

PMID41931482
PMCPMC13048402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.