Observational studyMedicine2026
Could impulse oscillometry be an easy and practical test for differential diagnosis in healthy adults and patients with asthma and COPD?
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a type of oscillation technique that can detect pathological changes in small airways early. While spirometry is still normal in asthma and in patients who will have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in future, IOS can detect increased airway resistance with increased sensitivity in the early stages. The aim of this study is to evaluate IOS in healthy adults and patients with asthma and COPD. In this prospective and observational study; healthy adults without any airway disease and patients with asthma and COPD admitted to the pulmonology outpatient clinic were included. The IOS and spirometry tests were performed simultaneously in all 3 groups, and the test results and demographic data were recorded. Higher AX (kPa/L), Fres (1/s), lower X5 Hz (kPa/[L/s]), FEV1(L), FEV1/FVC%, MEF 25-75 (L), FEV3 (L), FEV3/FEV6%, FEV3/FVC6% values were found in COPD and asthma patients compared to healthy adults. The resistance difference between 5 and 20 Hz was unaffected in asthma patients whereas it was higher in COPD patients than in healthy adults. R5 Hz (kPa/[L/s]) was significantly higher in COPD patients than in healthy and asthma patients (P = .01). Our study results suggest that IOS shows significant variations among healthy adults, asthma patients, and those with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.