ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
The Measurement and Application of Critical Speed and D' in Running: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical speed (CS) represents the maximal metabolic steady state in running, and D' represents the finite distance capacity above CS. However, there is currently no consensus on the optimal measurement and modelling methods to obtain CS and D' estimates, how CS and D' influence running performance, or how CS and D' have been applied within a training environment. The aims of this scoping review were to determine the specific protocols and modelling methods that have been implemented to quantify CS and D' in running; the deterministic potential of CS and D' for running race performance; and the application of CS and D' in individualising running training prescription. The PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and SPORTDiscus were systematically searched, and studies were screened for eligibility. A total of 124 studies were included in the review, of which 23 investigated CS as the maximal metabolic steady state, 68 investigated different measurement or modelling methods on CS and D', 16 examined different measurement methods on CS only, six investigated D' reconstitution, 26 studies explored the relationship between CS or D' and running performance, and 16 applied CS and D' modelling to individualise training prescription. CS has been validated as the boundary between the heavy- and severe-intensity domains while there is a far smaller body of research investigating D' reconstitution; however, variations in testing protocols may influence CS and D' estimation. Of importance to coaches and athletes is that CS and D' balance are particularly strong determinants of middle- and long-distance running performance (mile to marathon, and 5000 and 10,000 m, for CS and D' balance, respectively), and modelling of CS and D' provides an avenue to individualise training prescription.Open Science Framework (OSF) registration: https://osf.io/rq2h3 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.