Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41931177›Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2026

Chronic Co-administration of Methylphenidate and Fluoxetine Reduces Striatal NMDA Receptor Binding in Adolescent Rats.

George Lagamjis, Divon Slayton, Huy Lu, Caleigh Hoerner, Abigail M Lantry, Matthew Marion, Dan Elman, Michael Hadjiargyrou, David Komatsu, Panayotis K Thanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

George LagamjisBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Divon SlaytonBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Huy LuBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Caleigh HoernerBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Abigail M LantryBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Matthew MarionBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA.
Dan ElmanD'Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael HadjiargyrouDepartment of Biological and Chemical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, Westbury, NY, 11568, USA.
David KomatsuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Panayotis K ThanosBehavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Clinical Research Institute on Addictions, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 1021 Main Street, Buffalo, NY, 14203-1016, USA. thanos@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Serotonin receptors that potentiate addiction-related behavioral and molecular effects induced by methylphenidate plus SSRI exposureR01DA046794 · NIDA · ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIV OF MEDICINE & SCI · PI BOLANOS, CARLOS A., STEINER, HEINZ · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Skeletal Effects of MethylphenidateR01HD070888 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KOMATSU, DAVID E · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070888NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046794Research Foundation for the State University of New York This research was funded by the New York State Research Foundation (RIAQ0940) and NIH (R01 DA046794) (R01 HD070888)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylphenidate (MP), a widely used medicine for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is commonly prescribed in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) e.g., fluoxetine (FLX). However, neurochemical effects of the MP + FLX combination have not been sufficiently elucidated. Given the pivotal role played by glutamatergic signaling in psychostimulant responses and corticostriatal plasticity, we employed a 2-level factorial design to assess how the individual treatments and their co-administration affect N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) binding using [³H] MK-801 in vitro autoradiography. Three-week-old male rats were randomized into four groups: MP (30/60 mg/kg), FLX (20 mg/kg), MP + FLX (30/60 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg), and vehicle. Treatment was administered for four weeks using a dual bottle drinking paradigm that models human dosing and pharmacokinetics. Following the treatment, [³H] MK-801 in vitro autoradiography was performed on coronal brain sections. The MP + FLX group significantly decreased NMDA binding levels in the dorsal caudate-putamen (DCPU) (39%), ventral caudate-putamen (VCPU) (36%), and nucleus accumbens (Nac) (34%), compared to vehicle. Rats in the MP group demonstrated reduced NMDA binding in the DCPU only, and there were no significant differences in binding for the FLX group. These findings indicate that MP + FLX coadministration yields a reduction in NMDAR binding across the striatum, an effect not produced by either of the drugs. Thus, reduced NMDA binding following MP + FLX treatment may contribute to dysregulations in memory, motor, and reward systems. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the neurochemical, neurodevelopmental, and clinical correlates of MP + FLX glutamatergic effects in adolescent patients.

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumFluoxetineMethylphenidateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAnimalsAutoradiographyDizocilpine MaleateMaleProtein BindingRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDizocilpine MaleateFluoxetineMethylphenidateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAddictionAdolescenceFluoxetineMethylphenidateNMDA

Identifiers

PMID41931177
PMCPMC13048928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.