Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930988›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology2026

Phase 2, Multicenter Studies of Pegaspargase in Pediatric Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Russia: Comparative Study of Liquid and Lyophilized Pegaspargase and Roll-Over Study of Lyophilized Formulation.

Alexander I Karachunskiy, Sergey G Kovalenko, Vladimir V Lebedev, Olga I Plaksina, Natalia I Ponomareva, Vanessa Seif, Qian Meng, Sergey Grankov, Lorene Simonot, Larisa G Fechina and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander I KarachunskiyDmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology.
Sergey G KovalenkoChelyabinsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk.ORCID 0000-0001-6498-9776
Vladimir V LebedevRegional Children's Clinical Hospital, Krasnodar.
Olga I PlaksinaNizhny Novgorod Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Nizhny Novgorod.
Natalia I PonomarevaPirogov Russian National Research Medical Institute, Moscow.
Vanessa SeifServier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.
Qian MengServier BioInnovation, Boston, MA, USA.
Sergey GrankovServier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.
Lorene SimonotServier International Research Institute, Suresnes, France.
Larisa G FechinaRegional Children's Clinical Hospital.
Yulia V DinikinaFederal State Budgetary Institution, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (V.A. Almazov NMRC), St Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Funding

Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier and Les Laboratoires Servier, Moscow, Russia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pegaspargase, a well-established pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, is available as a liquid formulation, and a lyophilized formulation with an improved shelf life. The pharmacokinetics and safety of lyophilized and liquid pegaspargase were assessed in pediatric patients with ALL in Russia. In Study 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 1 intravenous injection of lyophilized or liquid pegaspargase; patients who benefited from pegaspargase continued into Study 2 and received lyophilized pegaspargase every 2 weeks for 9 infusions. Of the 89 patients in Study 1, 74 continued into Study 2. In Study 1, maximum observed plasma asparaginase activity and area under the PAA-time curve were similar between groups. Geometric mean ratios were 93.5% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 82.9, 105.5) and 102.8% (90% CI: 91.4, 115.6), respectively; therefore, the 90% CIs were completely contained within the predefined acceptance interval of 80% to 125%. Pegaspargase-related adverse events occurred in 88.4% and 91.1% in the lyophilized and liquid groups, respectively, in Study 1. The safety profile of lyophilized pegaspargase after repeated infusion in Study 2 was consistent with the known safety profile of pegaspargase. Pharmacokinetic exposure does not depend on pegaspargase formulation. These studies support the use of lyophilized pegaspargase.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAsparaginasePolyethylene GlycolsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFreeze DryingHumansInfantMaleRussiaAntineoplastic AgentsAsparaginasepegaspargasePolyethylene Glycolsacute lymphoblastic leukemialyophilized pegaspargasepediatricpharmacokinetic

Identifiers

PMID41930988
PMCPMC13095057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.