Trial reportJournal of pediatric hematology/oncology2026
Phase 2, Multicenter Studies of Pegaspargase in Pediatric Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Russia: Comparative Study of Liquid and Lyophilized Pegaspargase and Roll-Over Study of Lyophilized Formulation.
Trial report in Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pegaspargase, a well-established pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy, is available as a liquid formulation, and a lyophilized formulation with an improved shelf life. The pharmacokinetics and safety of lyophilized and liquid pegaspargase were assessed in pediatric patients with ALL in Russia. In Study 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 1 intravenous injection of lyophilized or liquid pegaspargase; patients who benefited from pegaspargase continued into Study 2 and received lyophilized pegaspargase every 2 weeks for 9 infusions. Of the 89 patients in Study 1, 74 continued into Study 2. In Study 1, maximum observed plasma asparaginase activity and area under the PAA-time curve were similar between groups. Geometric mean ratios were 93.5% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 82.9, 105.5) and 102.8% (90% CI: 91.4, 115.6), respectively; therefore, the 90% CIs were completely contained within the predefined acceptance interval of 80% to 125%. Pegaspargase-related adverse events occurred in 88.4% and 91.1% in the lyophilized and liquid groups, respectively, in Study 1. The safety profile of lyophilized pegaspargase after repeated infusion in Study 2 was consistent with the known safety profile of pegaspargase. Pharmacokinetic exposure does not depend on pegaspargase formulation. These studies support the use of lyophilized pegaspargase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.