Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930756›Full record

Trial reportPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2026

Comparison of the effects of Kinesio tape and high-intensity laser therapy applied in conjunction with physical therapy on pain, grip strength, and functional level in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Esin Akbaş, Abuzer Akbaş, Murat Ali Çınar, Serkan Usgu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esin AkbaşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1549-351X
Abuzer AkbaşAdıyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0607-9247
Murat Ali ÇınarFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-3759
Serkan UsguFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4820-9490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of various conventional treatments for lateral epicondylitis, but it is still unclear which treatment is most effective.

objectiveTo compare the effects of Kinesio tape (KT) and high-intensity laser therapy (HILT), applied in conjunction with physical therapy (PT), on pain, hand grip strength, functional status, and pain sensitivity in chronic lateral epicondylitis.

designRandomized controlled trial.

settingTertiary hospital physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic.

participantsPatients with chronic lateral epicondylitis.

methodsA total of 53 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were included in this randomized controlled study and were randomly assigned into three groups: PT-only group (n = 17), HILT group (n = 18), and KT group (n = 18). The PT-only group received PT; the KT group received PT and KT; and the HILT group received PT and HILT. The treatment period was 2 weeks, with five sessions per week.

main outcome measuresThe Visual Analog Scale (VAS), hand grip strength, Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE), and pain sensitivity were assessed before treatment, at the end of treatment (week 2), and at week 6. Treatment effects were analyzed using a mixed-design analysis of variance.

resultsA statistically significant interaction between group and time was found for VAS and PRTEE scores (p < .001). The main effects of time revealed statistically significant differences in the mean values of VAS and PRTEE (p < .001). In all groups, VAS and PRTEE measurements at weeks 2 and 6 showed statistically and clinically significant improvements compared to pretreatment values. A statistically significant difference between week 2 and week 6 was found only in the HILT group (p = .024 and p < .001, respectively). There was no statistically significant interaction between group and time for hand grip strength and pain sensitivity.

conclusionHILT with PT resulted in better outcomes in terms of pain and function compared to PT alone and PT combined with KT.

Indexed as

Athletic TapeHand StrengthLaser TherapyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTennis ElbowAdultCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41930756
PMCPMC13476661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.