Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930753›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026

Propionic Acid Outperforms Formic and Acetic Acid in MS Sensitivity for High-Flow Reversed-Phase LC-MS Bottom-Up Proteomics.

Mykyta R Starovoit, Siddharth Jadeja, Rudolf Kupčík, Saša Vatić, Jan Rasl, Derya Demir, Petr Novák, Cameron Braswell, Benjamin C Orsburn, Juraj Lenčo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mykyta R StarovoitDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic.
Siddharth JadejaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic.
Rudolf KupčíkBiomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Sokolská 581, Hradec Králové 500 05, Czech Republic.
Saša VatićLaboratory of Structural Biology and Cell Signaling, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BioCeV, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4 142 00, Czech Republic.
Jan RaslLaboratory of Structural Biology and Cell Signaling, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BioCeV, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4 142 00, Czech Republic.
Derya DemirDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic.
Petr NovákLaboratory of Structural Biology and Cell Signaling, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BioCeV, Vídeňská 1083, Prague 4 142 00, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8688-529X
Cameron BraswellOrgan Pathobiology and Therapeutics Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States.
Benjamin C OrsburnOrgan Pathobiology and Therapeutics Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-3750
Juraj LenčoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové 500 03, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8526-9249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formic acid has long been the default acidic additive in reversed-phase LC-MS-based bottom-up proteomics, offering a practical balance between chromatographic performance and electrospray ionization (ESI) efficiency. Here, we evaluate propionic acid as an alternative mobile phase acidifier, a candidate that has been largely overlooked in efforts to improve ESI efficiency without compromising chromatography. By reducing both the ionic strength and surface tension of the mobile phase, propionic acid markedly enhanced ESI efficiency, yielding an average 39% increase in peptide identifications compared to formic acid and even a 12% increase relative to the recently revived acetic acid. These gains were consistent across interlaboratory data sets encompassing analytical- and microflow LC-MS configurations, diverse column chemistries, and varying sample complexities. Importantly, chromatographic performance remained virtually unaffected, with only a minor reduction in peptide retention. The mobile phase containing propionic acid was stable, instrument-compatible, and introduced a negligible background signal. Collectively, these findings challenge the long-standing reliance on formic acid and establish propionic acid as a robust, drop-in alternative for high-flow LC-MS workflows prioritizing MS sensitivity and proteome depth.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseFormatesLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryPropionatesProteomicsPeptidesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationAcetic AcidFormatesformic acidPeptidesPropionatespropionic acid

Identifiers

PMID41930753
PMCPMC13084630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.