ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Propionic Acid Outperforms Formic and Acetic Acid in MS Sensitivity for High-Flow Reversed-Phase LC-MS Bottom-Up Proteomics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Formation of Hydroxylated-Benzoyl-Benzofuranones Following the Exposure of Quercetin and Kaempferol to aNitrite-Containing Acidic Medium.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formic acid has long been the default acidic additive in reversed-phase LC-MS-based bottom-up proteomics, offering a practical balance between chromatographic performance and electrospray ionization (ESI) efficiency. Here, we evaluate propionic acid as an alternative mobile phase acidifier, a candidate that has been largely overlooked in efforts to improve ESI efficiency without compromising chromatography. By reducing both the ionic strength and surface tension of the mobile phase, propionic acid markedly enhanced ESI efficiency, yielding an average 39% increase in peptide identifications compared to formic acid and even a 12% increase relative to the recently revived acetic acid. These gains were consistent across interlaboratory data sets encompassing analytical- and microflow LC-MS configurations, diverse column chemistries, and varying sample complexities. Importantly, chromatographic performance remained virtually unaffected, with only a minor reduction in peptide retention. The mobile phase containing propionic acid was stable, instrument-compatible, and introduced a negligible background signal. Collectively, these findings challenge the long-standing reliance on formic acid and establish propionic acid as a robust, drop-in alternative for high-flow LC-MS workflows prioritizing MS sensitivity and proteome depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.