ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Patients' and care partners' views on communicating the cause of dementia and related uncertainties: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDementia is a syndrome with various presumed causes, such as Alzheimer's disease. Communicating the cause of dementia is challenging for clinicians, involving complex information and frequent uncertainties.ObjectiveWe explored perspectives of patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia (Alzheimer's disease, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, or mixed pathology) and their care partners, on what communication they prefer about the cause of dementia and related uncertainty.MethodsWe held focus groups and interviews in the Netherlands, with 22 patients who had received a diagnosis at the memory clinic in the past four months, and their 21 care partners. Data were analyzed using content analysis.ResultsParticipants showed poor knowledge of the presumed cause, often mentioning risk factors (e.g., age, "bad luck", genetics, lifestyle). During the diagnostic disclosure, clinicians' communication efforts (e.g., visualization of test results) enhanced participants' understanding. Participants' needs regarding etiological information varied: some desired detailed information to obtain clarity and receive appropriate care, while others preferred minimal information because of perceived limited added value and potential information overload. We observed no clear demographic or clinical patterns in these preferences. Participants emphasized the importance of clinicians being explicit about the presence of uncertainty, with care partners particularly indicating strong information needs.ConclusionsFindings reveal much variation in the extent to which patients and care partners wish to receive information about the cause of dementia and related uncertainty, highlighting the need for a personalized approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.