ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
Applying a process mapping methodology to identify barriers and facilitators to social needs screener and medical-legal partnership integration into primary care facilities.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Primary care providers understand the importance of collecting social needs screener (SNS) information from patients. Gathering this information permits more comprehensive, patient-centered care plans and allows primary care settings to serve as a hub where patients can receive resources and referrals to address their social needs. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) are a legal intervention that can also connect patients to social services. However, barriers exist that prevent full integration of SNS and MLPs. This study aims to understand how best to integrate SNS and MLPs into primary care. Methods: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), an idealized process map and semi-structured interview guide were developed to facilitate interviews with primary care providers. The process map included four "swim lanes," including planning, patient-provider interaction, referrals, and MLPs. Eleven primary care providers from three different health systems were interviewed in January-March 2025. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data were coded inductively. Results: Eleven themes were identified from the interviews, including review and adaptation of SNS should be regular, involvement of providers and staff is necessary for SNS integration, cross-disciplinary training, physical space, and information technology is needed to promote MLP, and identification of local resources for social need referrals is critical for providers' buy-in. These themes were matched to constructs from CFIR. Conclusion: SNS and MLPs can be integrated into the clinical workflow, but external factors may negate the impacts of SNS success and MLP referrals. By addressing the barriers identified using implementation strategies, integration of SNS and MLPs into primary care can be more feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.