ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026
Predicting efficacy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with immunotherapy using explainable machine learning approaches: the SamUR-AI trial on behalf of the Meet-URO group.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped the treatment landscape for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), yet reliable predictive biomarkers remain limited. The SamUR-AI study was designed to evaluate whether machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approaches could improve prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with mUC treated with ICIs. Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis including 438 patients treated with ICIs across 34 Italian institutions from the Meet-URO network. Baseline clinical and laboratory features were analyzed using ML and XAI methodologies to predict objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Classification models showed suboptimal performance in predicting ORR (best test F1-score: 0.61), likely due to class imbalance and overfitting. In contrast, survival models achieved moderate predictive accuracy, with the extra survival trees model yielding a concordance index (C-index) of 0.67 for OS. SHapley Additive exPlanations-based explainability identified key prognostic factors, including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, line of immunotherapy and treatment combinations, liver and lung metastases, neutrophil count, and hemoglobin level. Conclusions: Although further validation is needed, our findings highlight the potential of XAI-enhanced ML to identify clinically relevant features and to support personalized treatment strategies in patients with mUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.