ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026
Age and frailty in anticancer drug regulatory assessment: a comprehensive cohort study of European marketing authorisations 2012-2023.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prevalence of cancer increases with age, but older adults remain underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. We analysed the representation of older adults and poor performance score patients in initial marketing authorisation (MA) of new anticancer medicines in the European Union (EU). Materials and methods: Medicines with an anticancer indication authorised in the EU during the years 2012-2023 were analysed based on public assessment reports (EPARs). We identified original clinical studies and datasets based on the classification in the EPARs. Results: One hundred and thirty-seven products and MAs, corresponding with 153 efficacy datasets fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most studies had enrolled subjects in age groups 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years of age; however, the proportion of individuals in these age groups was low. The majority of cases analysed efficacy in patient subgroups of >65 years of age, whereas a minority of studies evaluated efficacy for groups older than 70 years. No differences were observed between time cohorts from 2012-2017 and 2018-2023. Fifty-one percent of datasets allowed inclusion of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2, whereas the median proportion of these patients was 1.8%. Safety was specifically analysed in subjects of >65 years of age in 92% of MAs. A dedicated discussion on age and/or frailty was identified in 45% of the MAs. Age- or frailty-related Annex II conditions were found in 10 cases. Conclusion: Older adults and patients with higher performance scores have been included in the pivotal MA data and analyses, but their proportions have remained low. An opportunity for structured communication on age-related uncertainties is identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.