ArticleESMO real world data and digital oncology2026
Prognostic impact of clinical factors in MSI-H/dMMR gastrointestinal tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: results from a multicenter real-world study.
Article in ESMO real world data and digital oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic relevance of secondary actionable fusions in MLH1-deficient dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal tumors treated with pembrolizumab.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) provide durable benefit in high microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) gastrointestinal (GI) tumors, but real-world evidence across colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-CRC primaries remains limited. Materials and methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including 122 patients with advanced MSI-H/dMMR GI tumors treated with ICIs in eight Spanish university hospitals. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response, and safety. Results: Median age at ICI initiation was 70.4 years; 79.5% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1. CRC accounted for 54.9% of cases, gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) for 34.4%, and other GI tumors for 10.7%. At a median follow-up of 33 months, median PFS was 46.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.6-61.4 months] and median OS was 53.2 months (95% CI 42.6-63.7 months), with 36-month rates of 57.1% for PFS and 62.8% for OS. The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.7% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 91.1%, with comparable efficacy across CRC, GEA, and other GI tumor subgroups. In multivariable analysis, ECOG PS was the only independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS. Treatment was generally well tolerated; 47.5% of patients experienced adverse events, grade ≥3 in 10.7%, with no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: In this multicenter European real-world cohort, ICIs demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable benefit in advanced MSI-H/dMMR GI tumors, confirming pivotal trial results in routine practice. ECOG PS emerged as the main independent prognostic factor, underscoring its central role in patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.