ArticleJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2024
Acquisition and validation of four pain subtypes of colon adenocarcinoma and prognostic analysis.
Article in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is the most common type of colorectal cancer. Pain is a multidimensional unpleasant experience involving various molecular and cellular pathways. Nevertheless, the exploration of pain-related genes related to colon adenocarcinoma remains unclear yet. Methods: In this study, the pathways enriched with pain-related genes were analyzed using Metascape. Then, we identified pain subtypes and classical subtypes and explored the link between them. Next, marker genes for different pain subtypes were identified, and their enrichment pathways were explored. These marker genes were then used to validate the pain subtypes. Subsequently, we performed an investigation of survival differences between pain subtypes by selecting specific top pathways in each subtype, calculating top pathway scores and pathway differences using heatmap and Kruskal test. Finally, we predicted the response of different pain subtypes to immunotherapy. Results: A total of 146 pain-related genes were included in this study and we finally identified 4 pain subtypes and 4 stable subtypes. The marker genes for subtypes were validated by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, revealing a worse prognosis for CS1. The genes of CS1, CS2, CS3 and CS4 markers were primarily enriched in the pathways of Focal adhesion, Human T cell leukemia virus1 infection, Metabolic pathway, and Pertussis, respectively. CS1 and CS4 were found to be more immunogenic. Moreover, CS1 was more sensitive to treatment with CTLA4 inhibitors, while CS4 was sensitive to treatment with PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions: Our study's identification of four pain subtypes of COAD provides new insights for personalized therapy for patients with COAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.