ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Classification of pediatric dental diseases from panoramic radiographs using natural language transformer and deep learning models.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Its Trust and Translation.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Diagnostic Charting on Panoramic Radiography: Comparison of YOLOv11 and YOLOv12.Odontology · 2026Article
- Beyond 2D and CNNs: Future Directions for Deep Learning in Periodontal Diagnostics.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and localization performance of multimodal large language models in the interpretation of dental periapical radiographs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Classification of pediatric dental diseases from panoramic radiographs using natural language transformer and deep learning models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate classification of pediatric dental diseases from panoramic radiographs is essential for early diagnosis and effective treatment planning. While deep learning models traditionally operate directly on image data, text-based representations generated from radiographs may provide an alternative strategy for disease classification. Methods: This study proposed a text-driven framework in which a natural language transformer was used to generate structured textual descriptions from panoramic radiographs. These descriptions were subsequently classified for binary disease detection using three deep learning architectures: a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), a long short-term memory (LSTM) network, and a pretrained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformer (BERT) model. Model performance was evaluated and compared against three pretrained convolutional neural networks trained directly on radiographic images. Results: The 1D-CNN achieved the highest performance with 84% accuracy, demonstrating balanced classification across disease categories. The BERT model reached 77% accuracy, showing strong performance in detecting periapical infections but comparatively lower sensitivity for caries identification. The LSTM model performed substantially worse, achieving 57% accuracy. Both the 1D-CNN and BERT text-based approaches outperformed the three image-based pretrained CNN models. Discussion: These findings suggest that text-based classification of panoramic radiographs is a potential alternative to conventional image-based deep learning methods. Language-driven models show promise for radiographic interpretation; however, challenges remain in achieving consistent generalizability across disease types. Future research should focus on improving radiograph-to-text generation quality, developing hybrid architectures that integrate textual and visual features, and validating performance on larger and more diverse datasets to strengthen clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.