Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930174›Full record

ArticleOncology research2026

Exploring Machine Learning Approaches for Decision Support in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Eshita Dhar, Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Divyabharathy Ramesh Nadar, Li-Jen Kuo, Jitendra Jonnagaddala, Yaoru Huang, Mohy Uddin, Shabbir Syed-Abdul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eshita DharGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Muhammad Ashad KabirSchool of Computing, Mathematics and Engineering, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, Australia.
Divyabharathy Ramesh NadarCGD Health Pvt Ltd., Mumbai, India.
Li-Jen KuoDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jitendra JonnagaddalaDiscipline of General Practice, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.
Yaoru HuangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mohy UddinResearch Quality Management Department, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shabbir Syed-AbdulGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Decisions regarding CT after nCCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are challenging due to limited evidence guiding treatment. This study aimed to (i) evaluate the predictive performance of machine learning (ML) models in patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (nCCRT) alone vs. those receiving nCCRT plus chemotherapy (CT), (ii) identify features associated with treatment improvement, and (iii) derive ML-based thresholds for treatment response. Methods: This retrospective study included 409 patients with LARC treated at three affiliated hospitals of Taipei Medical University. Patients were categorised into two groups: nCCRT alone followed by surgery ( Results: K-Star achieved the highest accuracy for nCCRT alone (80.8%; AUC = 0.89), while Random Committee performed best for nCCRT plus CT (77.3%; AUC = 0.84). Clinical N stage (cN) ranked highest, followed by Sodium (Na), Glutamic pyruvic transaminase, estimated glomerular filtration rate, body weight, red blood cell count, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and blood urea nitrogen. Threshold patterns suggested that CT-related improvement aligned with higher lymphocyte percentage and lower platelet distribution width, whereas nCCRT-only improvement aligned with elevated eGFR, GPT, and cN = 2. Conclusions: ML-based analysis identified key predictors and demonstrated good model performance, supporting individualised post-nCCRT chemotherapy decisions.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAgedChemoradiotherapyClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudieschemoradiotherapyMachine learningpredictive modellingrectal cancertreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41930174
PMCPMC13040307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.