ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exosome-mediated muscle-bone crosstalk: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Smart and stimuli-responsive hydrogels for controlled exosome delivery in bone tissue engineering: from passive carriers to intelligent therapeutic platforms.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Glioma-derived extracellular vesicles as drivers of immunotherapeutic resistance: mechanisms of immune reprogramming and metabolic intervention.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Exosomes are nanosized extracellular vesicles that facilitate intercellular communication through their diverse molecular cargo, including proteins, microRNAs, and lipids. By modulating inflammation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling, exosomes have emerged as promising therapeutic agents in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Understanding source-specific characteristics, isolation methods, and delivery strategies is crucial to optimize their clinical translation. Methods: This review employed a review approach, integrating preclinical and clinical evidence to provide a comprehensive overview of exosome biology, sources, isolation techniques, delivery modalities, and therapeutic applications. Emphasis was placed on highlighting mechanistic insights, translational relevance, and comparative analyses of different exosome sources and delivery strategies. The methodology prioritized thematic organization and qualitative integration over quantitative meta-analysis to capture the breadth of current knowledge and emerging trends in regenerative and reconstructive surgery. Results: Adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) exosomes provided high yields with strong angiogenic and anti-fibrotic effects, whereas bone marrow MSC (BM-MSC) and dermal fibroblast exosomes primarily contributed immunomodulatory and extracellular matrix regulatory functions. Umbilical cord MSC (UC-MSC) exosomes showed high proliferative and angiogenic potential. Delivery methods, including topical, hydrogel-based, and direct injection approaches, influenced therapeutic outcomes. Preclinical and early-phase clinical studies reported improved wound closure, scar modulation, and aesthetic outcomes, though the clinical evidence remains predominantly derived from small pilot studies and exploratory trials with limited sample sizes and follow-up durations. Variability in isolation protocols, dosing, and characterization further limited standardization. Discussion: Exosome-based therapy represents a versatile, minimally immunogenic regenerative approach. Standardized source selection, scalable GMP-compliant isolation, and optimized delivery are essential for reproducibility and clinical translation. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to confirm efficacy and establish standardized dosing protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.