ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Molecular hydrogen as a treatment for ME/CFS: a mini-review of clinical evidence and mechanistic rationale.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating multisystem illness characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction, yet it currently lacks FDA-approved treatments. Molecular hydrogen (H2), administered primarily as hydrogen-rich water (HRW), has emerged as a potential therapeutic candidate due to its selective antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory activity, and support of mitochondrial and cellular homeostasis. These mechanisms align with several biological abnormalities implicated in ME/CFS, including oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and impaired energy metabolism. This narrative mini-review summarizes mechanistic evidence relevant to ME/CFS and evaluates three developmental clinical studies of HRW in this population. Although early trials are small and methodologically limited, moderate-dose HRW consumed over extended durations has demonstrated feasibility and preliminary benefits in reducing fatigue and improving physical function, with generally mild side effects. Overlapping findings in Long COVID further suggest potential applicability across related post-viral fatigue conditions. Key limitations include small sample sizes, reliance on self-report outcomes, and the absence of objective biomarkers. Future research should prioritize larger, rigorously controlled trials incorporating remote biometric and biochemical assessments to clarify mechanisms of action and identify responsive subgroups. Overall, molecular hydrogen represents a promising, low-burden adjunctive therapy warranting further investigation in ME/CFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.