Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930109›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Molecular hydrogen as a treatment for ME/CFS: a mini-review of clinical evidence and mechanistic rationale.

Fred Friedberg, Tyler W LeBaron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fred FriedbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Stony Brook University Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Tyler W LeBaronDepartment of Kinesiology and Outdoor Recreation, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating multisystem illness characterized by profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, cognitive impairment, and autonomic dysfunction, yet it currently lacks FDA-approved treatments. Molecular hydrogen (H2), administered primarily as hydrogen-rich water (HRW), has emerged as a potential therapeutic candidate due to its selective antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory activity, and support of mitochondrial and cellular homeostasis. These mechanisms align with several biological abnormalities implicated in ME/CFS, including oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and impaired energy metabolism. This narrative mini-review summarizes mechanistic evidence relevant to ME/CFS and evaluates three developmental clinical studies of HRW in this population. Although early trials are small and methodologically limited, moderate-dose HRW consumed over extended durations has demonstrated feasibility and preliminary benefits in reducing fatigue and improving physical function, with generally mild side effects. Overlapping findings in Long COVID further suggest potential applicability across related post-viral fatigue conditions. Key limitations include small sample sizes, reliance on self-report outcomes, and the absence of objective biomarkers. Future research should prioritize larger, rigorously controlled trials incorporating remote biometric and biochemical assessments to clarify mechanisms of action and identify responsive subgroups. Overall, molecular hydrogen represents a promising, low-burden adjunctive therapy warranting further investigation in ME/CFS.

Indexed as

hydrogen-rich waterME/CFSmitochondrial dysfunctionmolecular hydrogenoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID41930109
PMCPMC13039090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.