Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930081›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Principles of Abdominal Wall Closure: A Narrative Review of Evidence-Based Techniques, Contemporary Updates, and Emerging Innovations.

Umang K Agrawal, Sakshi Jaiswal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Umang K AgrawalGeneral Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Varanasi, IND.
Sakshi JaiswalGeneral Surgery, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Varanasi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal wall closure is a critical determinant of postoperative outcomes following laparotomy. Despite advances in surgical technique and perioperative care, complications, such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection (SSI), remain prevalent and contribute significantly to long-term morbidity and healthcare expenditure. Over the past three decades, improved understanding of fascial biomechanics, wound healing physiology, and suture mechanics has reshaped closure strategies. Evidence now supports small bites continuous closure with an adequate suture-to-wound length ratio as a biomechanically superior technique. Selective prophylactic mesh reinforcement in high-risk populations has further reduced hernia incidence. Advances in open abdomen management, component separation techniques, minimally invasive repair, and robotic-assisted closure continue to expand reconstructive options. This narrative review synthesizes anatomical foundations, randomized evidence, preventive strategies, emerging technologies, and complication patterns in abdominal wall closure. Contemporary best practice requires integration of anatomical precision, biomechanical principles, patient risk stratification, and judicious adoption of evolving technologies. Future research should prioritize standardized reporting frameworks, long-term comparative outcomes, and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Indexed as

abdominal wall closurecomponent separationincisional herniaopen abdomenprophylactic meshsmall-bites techniquesurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID41930081
PMCPMC13039261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.