Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930066›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Clinical Outcomes Following Dual-Frequency Noninvasive Monopolar Radiofrequency Treatment for Facial Laxity and Lower Face Lifting: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Robert A Weiss, Jordan Wang, Barry DiBernardo, Ashish C Bhatia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert A WeissDermatology, Maryland Laser, Skin, and Vein Institute, Baltimore, USA.
Jordan WangDermatology, Laser and Skin - Dermatology, Devon, USA.
Barry DiBernardoPlastic Surgery, New Jersey Plastic Surgery, Montclair, USA.
Ashish C BhatiaDermatology, Oak Dermatology, Naperville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Facial aging is a common dermatological and plastic surgical concern. As patients today wish to avoid surgical intervention, noninvasive monopolar radiofrequency (NMRF) can be a useful tool to address this concern, but results have varied by target depth. A dual-frequency NMRF system (6.78 MHz and 2 MHz) is designed to support depth-dependent tissue heating across dermal and subdermal planes. This study aimed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes and safety in a prospective multicenter trial. Methods Thirty-nine subjects at four clinical sites completed the study. The protocol allowed up to three treatments spaced four weeks apart; however, all subjects completed the study after two sessions. Treatments were delivered at three different depths (shallow, middle, and deep), as indicated by the target condition and facial anatomical zone. Standardized clinical photography was taken at baseline, 30- and 90-day timepoints. A five-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was assessed by the principal investigators at the 30- and 90-day assessments, and patients subjectively scored their satisfaction using a study-specific patient satisfaction score (PSS; six-point scale). GAIS results were evaluated for statistical significance; satisfaction was summarized descriptively with exact 95% CIs. Any adverse events were documented. Results A total of 39 subjects received two treatment sessions. Clinician-scored GAIS achieved three or above by 84.6% (33/39; 95% CI, 69.5-94.1) of subjects at 30-day and 92.3% (36/39; 95% CI, 79.1-98.4) of subjects at 90-day timepoints (p=0.0293 and 0.0008, respectively). Patient satisfaction was also high, scoring of four or above for 79.5% of participants at 30-day (31/39; 95% CI, 64.5-89.2%) and 84.6% at 90-day (33/39; 95% CI, 70.3-92.8%). There were no long-lasting adverse events. Conclusion Dual-frequency NMRF, applied with depth-dependent settings in this study, was associated with significant short-term improvement and high satisfaction at 30 and 90 days, with no persistent adverse events. These findings support further evaluation of this noninvasive RF approach for facial aging.

Indexed as

adverse eventsdual-frequency radiofrequencyfacial laxityglobal aesthetic improvement scalelower face liftingmonopolar radiofrequencynoninvasive monopolar radiofrequencynoninvasive skin tighteningpatient satisfaction scoreprospective multicenter study

Identifiers

PMID41930066
PMCPMC13040610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.