Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930050›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Real-World Experience With Givosiran in Acute Porphyrias: A Narrative Review and a Novel Hypothesis.

Petro E Petrides

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Target, silence, replace: a review on RNA-based drugs in modern medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Petro E PetridesDepartment of Porphyria Expertise, International Porphyria Network (IPNET), Hematology Oncology Center, Munich, DEU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-world experience with givosiran has been accumulating after its approval for the treatment of patients with acute porphyria and chronic attacks in the United States and in Europe, respectively. Up to now, nearly as many patients from various countries have been treated after the registration of the drug and reported in real-world studies as treated in the randomized phase 3 ENVISION trial. Most reports confirm high drug efficiency, but some also report adverse effects (homocysteinemia, lipase elevation, and kidney function impairment). Moreover, many patients suffer from breakthrough attacks, which remain a conundrum. Since gallbladder epithelial cells also contain the asialoglycoprotein receptor, which is a prerequisite for the uptake of givosiran, it could be that the siRNA-induced depletion of haem leads to a disturbance of the function of the gallbladder. Therefore, we hypothesize a potential role of the gallbladder and the metabolism of bile acids in the development of porphyria and givosiran-resistant attacks, which has to be supported by clinical or experimental validation.

Indexed as

acute porphyria elevateasgp-receptorbile acidsbreakthrough attackconundrumenvision trialgall bladdergivosiranpancreatitisreal-world experience

Identifiers

PMID41930050
PMCPMC13042996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.