ArticleCureus2026
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Detecting Active Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major worldwide health concern. It is a major cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and chronic hepatitis. Testing for anti-HCV antibodies is common for screening purposes, but it does not distinguish between an active and a past infection. A real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based detection of HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) is used to confirm active infection following initial serological screening. The current study aimed to assess the proportion of HCV RNA positivity, the distribution of viral load, and its association with demographic, serological, and biochemical markers in patients screened for HCV infection. Materials and methods This study was a retrospective analysis carried out at a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, India. It involved 383 patients who were screened for hepatitis C virus infection between July 2023 and July 2024. HCV RNA detection and viral load quantification were performed using RT-PCR. Testing for anti-HCV antibodies was carried out using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). The liver function parameters were obtained from laboratory records at the time of HCV testing. The clinical details of the study patients were assessed retrospectively from the medical records. Demographic details such as age, gender, and clinical diagnosis were collected. The results were tabulated, and statistical analysis was performed. Results Of the 383 individuals tested, 98 (25.6%) were positive for HCV RNA. Individuals aged ≥60 years constituted 56.6% of cases within that age group and accounted for the majority of HCV RNA-positive individuals, demonstrating a statistically significant association with HCV RNA positivity (chi-square {χ²} = 88.37; p < 0.001). Women demonstrated a higher HCV RNA positivity rate (30.0%) compared to men (23.6%), though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.181). Viral load analysis showed that 51.0% of individuals had low-level viremia (11-100,000 IU/mL), while 26.5% had viral loads exceeding 500,000 IU/mL. Liver enzyme elevation did not differ significantly between dialysis and non-dialysis groups (p = 0.586). However, a significant association was observed between higher viral load (>500,000 IU/mL) and liver enzyme elevation (p = 0.030). Among HCV RNA-positive individuals, 29.6% were nonreactive for anti-HCV antibodies. Conclusion This study focuses on the importance of molecular testing for detecting active HCV infections in tertiary care settings. Compared to conventional screening methods, HCV RNA testing provides a more reliable confirmation of active disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.