Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41930019›Full record

ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology

The skills and keystone assessment for regional anesthesia (SanKARA) scoring system for evaluating competency in peribulbar anesthesia.

Matteo Ripa, Deergha Pareek, Neeraj Apoorva Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matteo RipaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Deergha PareekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Neeraj Apoorva ShahDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sankara Eye Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to introduce a standardized tool, developed through expert consensus with face and content validation, that integrates a comprehensive rubric with a scoring system for evaluating the ophthalmology residents' competency in peribulbar anesthesia: The Skills and Keystone Assessment for Regional Anesthesia (SanKARA) Scoring System. MATERIALS AND

methodsA multidisciplinary expert panel from Sankara Eye Hospital, Jaipur, India, each with experience of ≥2000 peribulbar anesthesia blocks, was established to develop a tool that combined a comprehensive rubric outlining essential competency criteria with a scoring system designed to assign numerical values to performance. The explicit behavioral descriptors for each crucial step of the peribulbar block were scored using a modified four-point Dreyfus scale of skill acquisition.

resultsThe SanKARA Scoring System encompassed 20 crucial steps for evaluating competency in peribulbar anesthesia. These steps were further subgrouped into specific categories (pre-procedural-related, procedural-related, and post-procedural-related) to summarize the specific stages of the whole procedure. Key procedural aspects included needle positioning, drug administration, patient monitoring, and adverse event management.

conclusionsThe SanKARA Scoring System integrates a structured rubric and scoring system to standardize peribulbar anesthesia training. This system can be globally adopted to assess and improve the training of ophthalmology residents, guide them in learning this paramount skill, and set a global competency benchmark.

Indexed as

Ocular anesthesiaperibulbar blockrubricskill assessment

Identifiers

PMID41930019
PMCPMC13043115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.