ArticleOman journal of ophthalmology
Sighting dominance, retinal nerve fiber layer and macula; are they related? - An ocular dominance analysis study.
Article in Oman journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to study ocular dominance and its association with retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 432 participants with nonpathological eyes. We determined the ocular dominance by the hole-in-card test (Dolman method). A comprehensive eye examination was conducted on the participants, including best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and anterior and posterior segment examination. The RNFL thickness was measured using optical coherence tomography. The findings were analyzed using paired
resultsOut of the 432 participants, 70.4% (304) showed right eye dominance of study population had right eye dominance. The average RNFL (AvRNFL) thickness showed a small but significantly higher value in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. We found significantly higher RNFL thickness in temporal, inferior and nasal quadrants in dominant eyes compared to nondominant eyes. Age had minimal effect on the difference in AvRNFL thickness between dominant and nondominant eyes (
conclusionsOcular dominance was found predominantly in the right eye. The dominant eye showed greater AvRNFL thickness compared to nondominant eye. AvRNFL, inferior RNFL, Nasal RNFL, Temporal RNFL thickness were greater in the dominant eye compared to the nondominant eye. There was no difference in macular thickness. Our findings suggest the need to consider dominance in various disease entities, in clinical decision making and normative data particularly concerning retinal nerve fiber layer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.