ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Estimates of current capacity for diagnosing and implementation of new treatment Alzheimer's disease in Slovenia.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The limited efficacy of current symptomatic treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) leads many patients to forgo medical help. However, new disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), such as donanemab and lecanemab, show potential to change this. Objective: To model the impact of these treatments on Slovenia's healthcare system by analyzing patient flow under both current and enhanced capacities, assuming DMT availability. Methods: The study estimates 76,923 potential DMT candidates aged 65 years and older with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD. Using data from Slovenia's three specialized centers for cognitive disorders, a Markov model simulated five five-year scenarios: baseline, real-life, real-life with capacity enhancement, biomarker integration, and biomarker integration with capacity enhancement. Results: Waiting times for specialist evaluation would increase from the current 3-12 months to 1.8 years. The primary bottleneck is lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, during which 64% of patients would become ineligible for DMT. The shortest waiting time to receive DMT occurs in the biomarker integration with capacity enhancement scenario, at 4 years, reducing ineligibility to 7%. Conclusions: Current specialized outpatient facilities are limited, causing significant bottlenecks, especially in CSF analysis. Severe waiting times under current capacities mean many patients would progress to moderate or severe dementia or die before receiving treatment. Plasma biomarkers offer a promising triage approach to guide patients toward lumbar puncture or other confirmatory diagnostics, potentially easing this critical bottleneck. Substantial infrastructure and workforce improvements are essential to ensure timely and equitable access to DMTs in Slovenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.