Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41929943›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports

Prediction of clinical and language changes after a single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: A machine learning approach.

Carlos Moral Rubio, Lucía Fernández-Romero, Paloma Balugo, Adela Fraile-Pereda, Paz Suárez-Coalla, Maria Nieves Cabrera-Martin, Miguel Yus-Fuertes, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, José L Ayala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlos Moral RubioDepartment of Computer Architecture and Automation, Faculty of Informatics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Fernández-RomeroDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Paloma BalugoDepartment of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISCC), Madrid, Spain.
Adela Fraile-PeredaDepartment of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISCC), Madrid, Spain.
Paz Suárez-CoallaFaculty of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9772-2680
Maria Nieves Cabrera-MartinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Yus-FuertesDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
Jordi A Matias-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-2708
José L AyalaDepartment of Computer Architecture and Automation, Faculty of Informatics, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) offers a non-invasive therapeutic option for primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and Alzheimer's disease among other neurological conditions. Objective: This study aims to enhance the personalization of rTMS therapy by predicting patient-specific changes after one session of rTMS across multiple clinical assessments, based on the targeted stimulation area. Methods: We studied 20 PPA patients, each receiving rTMS targeting in three distinct brain regions. Using machine learning, we developed predictive models for eight clinical outcome measures, incorporating features extracted from structural MRI, resting-state EEG, and individualized electric field modeling via SimNIBS. These features were used to estimate each patient's likely response to rTMS in terms of cognitive and language function. Results: Of the outcome measures, 'Clinical impression of change' emerged as the most reliable indicator of perceived improvement, achieving a top F1-score of 0.80 using a Decision Tree model based solely on sociodemographic features. Meanwhile, 'Words per minute' reached an F1-score of 0.77 with a Random Forest model utilizing EEG-derived features. Conclusions: The predictive models developed in this study underscore the feasibility of using EEG and SimNIBS data to anticipate patient outcomes from rTMS therapy. This data-driven framework can aid in customizing rTMS protocols, paving the way for more targeted and effective interventions for PPA and related neurodegenerative conditions.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseelectroencephalographymachine learningprimary progressive aphasiarepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41929943
PMCPMC13039075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.